she just laughed and said 'oh you're so funny'

I read this article yesterday morning and practically spat all over a memorandum.

There were two things about it that particularly touched my central nervous system:

1. After doing what black-armband historians will one day describe as ‘fuckawl’ for Mr Hicks for practically this entire millennium, John Howard is now taking credit for the fact that ‘the process has been accelerated’ due to his ‘personal appeals’ to Dick n George.


Dear John,

I refer to your claim that your cocksucking skills are highly influential with ‘Americans of Note’.

I now request that you supply further and better particulars as to:

1. why you neglected to make demands regarding expeditious charging of Mr Hicks during any of the previous ‘mutually satisfying oral love related encounters’ you have had with Mssrs Bush & Cheney over the previous five years; and

2. how much you charge for anal.


Kind Regards,

mister nora


2. “I've said very directly to both President Bush and to the vice-president that whatever may be the feelings about Mr Hicks' alleged behaviour, it was simply not acceptable that somebody be detained indefinitely without trial.”


Dear John,

I refer you to the 2003 case of Al-Kateb v Godwin. I must alert you to the alarming possibility that your Immigration Department is running ethically squalid Court cases behind your back. I suggest that this is the only explanation for the fact that Mr Ruddock et al successfully [which reminds me: Dear High Court, WTF?] argued that it was ‘fucking A-OK’ to keep asylum seekers in indefinite detention without trial and no foreseeable prospect of release - clearly a position which you personally abhor!

Or is it only A-OK if it is towel-head/politically expedient? Pls explain.


Kind Regards,

mister nora



NB resort to politikz commentary for blog fodder may or may not indicate that I am now Adult/Not Drunk.



OH WHEN YOU'RE NEAR ME, DARLING CAN'T YOU HEAR ME?


xoxo nora